The characteristics and predictors of mortality in periprosthetic fractures around the knee.

Aims: Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around the knee are challenging injuries. This study aims to describe the characteristics of knee PPFs and the impact of patient demographics, fracture types, and management modalities on in-hospital mortality. Methods: Using a multicentre study design, independent of registry data, we included adult patients sustaining a PPF around a knee arthroplasty between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019. Univariate, then multivariable, logistic regression analyses were performed to study the impact of patient, fracture, and treatment on mortality. Results: Out of a total of 1,667 patients in the PPF study database, 420 patients were included. The in-hospital mortality rate was 6.4%. Multivariable analyses suggested that American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, history of peripheral vascular disease (PVD), history of rheumatic disease, fracture around a loose implant, and cerebrovascular accident (CVA) during hospital stay were each independently associated with mortality. Each point increase in ASA grade independently correlated with a four-fold greater mortality risk (odds ratio (OR) 4.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 to 14.06); p = 0.026). Patients with PVD have a nine-fold increase in mortality risk (OR 9.1 (95% CI 1.25 to 66.47); p = 0.030) and patients with rheumatic disease have a 6.8-fold increase in mortality risk (OR 6.8 (95% CI 1.32 to 34.68); p = 0.022). Patients with a fracture around a loose implant (Unified Classification System (UCS) B2) have a 20-fold increase in mortality, compared to UCS A1 (OR 20.9 (95% CI 1.61 to 271.38); p = 0.020). Mode of management was not a significant predictor of mortality. Patients managed with revision arthroplasty had a significantly longer length of stay (median 16 days; p = 0.029) and higher rates of return to theatre, compared to patients treated nonoperatively or with fixation. Conclusion: The mortality rate in PPFs around the knee is similar to that for native distal femur and neck of femur fragility fractures. Patients with certain modifiable risk factors should be optimized. A national PPF database and standardized management guidelines are currently required to understand these complex injuries and to improve patient outcomes.

Predictors of mortality in periprosthetic fractures of the hip: Results from the national PPF study.

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around the hip joint are increasing in prevalence. In this collaborative study, we aimed to investigate the impact of patient demographics, fracture characteristics, and modes of management on in-hospital mortality of PPFs involving the hip. METHODS: Using a multi-centre cohort study design, we retrospectively identified adults presenting with a PPF around the hip over a 10-year period. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to study the independent correlation between patient, fracture, and treatment factors on mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1,109 patients were included. The in-hospital mortality rate was 5.3%. Multivariable analyses suggested that age, male sex, abbreviated mental test score (AMTS), pneumonia, renal failure, history of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and deep surgical site infection were each independently associated with mortality. Each yearly increase in age independently correlates with a 7% increase in mortality (OR 1.07, p=0.019). The odds of mortality was 2.99 times higher for patients diagnosed with pneumonia during their hospital stay [OR 2.99 (95% CI 1.07-8.37) p=0.037], and 7.25 times higher for patients that developed renal failure during their stay [OR 7.25 (95% CI 1.85-28.47) p=0.005]. Patients with history of PVD have a six-fold greater mortality risk (OR 6.06, p=0.003). Mode of treatment was not a significant predictor of mortality. CONCLUSION: The in-hospital mortality rate of PPFs around the hip exceeds 5%. The fracture subtype and mode of management are not independent predictors of mortality, while patient factors such as age, AMTS, history of PVD, pneumonia, and renal failure can independently predict mortality. Peri-operative optimisation of modifiable risk factors such as lung and kidney function in patients with PPFs around the hip during their hospital stay is of utmost importance.

The impact of the post- COVID 19 pandemic elective waiting list delays on patient reported symptoms and intention to proceed with planned upper limb surgeries-A prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate patient reported outcome measures using the EQ5D-5L and EQ5D-5L visual analogue scale (VAS) following elective shoulder and elbow orthopaedic list delays. This was further correlated with patients' intention to proceed with the planned surgery. METHODS: Patients on the waiting list for more than 26 weeks were included in the study. Telephone interviews were conducted utilising the EQ5D-5L and the EQ5D-5L VAS at the time of addition to the waiting list and presently. RESULTS: 75 out of 324 screened patients were eligible. 62 (82.7%) patients still wanted to proceed with their planned procedure while 13 (17.3%) patients in the other group no longer wanted to proceed. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean age, gender, initial trial of conservative treatment and limb laterality between these groups (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the mean duration of being on the waiting list between these groups (40.4 ± 19 vs. 62.9 ± 17.5 weeks respectively). Furthermore, statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in the current EQ5D-5L VAS scores were observed between these groups (52.4 vs. 65.8 respectively). CONCLUSION: This study has shown that majority of patients on elective shoulder and elbow orthopaedic lists with prolonged waiting list delays and improved EQ5D-5L scores are likely to decline the planned procedure and vice versa. Nevertheless, the unplanned 'watchful waiting' caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and leading to patients deciding to decline surgery, is not a substitute for timely planned surgery to alleviate patients' suffering.

A Quality Improvement Project to Improve Periprosthetic Fracture Management at District General Hospitals.

Introduction The incidence of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPF) is expected to rise by 4.6% every decade over the next 30 years. The risk of mortality for patients who sustained a PPF was found to be similar to the mortality rate after a native hip fracture, and so The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines advocate the timely management and mobilisation for patients with PPFs. Patient outcomes following these complex surgeries can be highly variable owing to the variability in regional practice and service delivery. This study aimed to review the management trend and outcomes of periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) involving hip and knee prostheses at a busy district general hospital in order to improve the overall efficacy in managing these complex fractures. Methods This retrospective study included 67 patients who presented to a single district general hospital during a two-year period. Data was collected on demographic profile, further onward referral to a tertiary centre, management (operative versus conservative), timing of surgery, complications, length of stay, implant survivorship, 30-day, one-year, and two-year mortality rate. Results Out of the total of 67 PPFs, 51 (76%) were managed operatively, and 16 (24%) were managed conservatively. Of the operatively managed PPFs, 49 (96%) were managed locally at the district general hospital, and two (4%) were managed at the tertiary centre. Eighteen patients (37%) underwent both revision and fixation, whilst 31 (63%) underwent fixation alone. The mortality rates at 30 days, one year, and two years were 10.4%, 20.9%, and 25.4%, respectively. For PPF patients managed operatively, the mean time taken from presentation to operation was 89.2 hours. The overall mean length of hospital stay for all patients was 23.6 days. Eight patients suffered complications. The implant survivorship at two years was 98%. Conclusion This study adds objective support for the successful operative management of PPFs at district general hospitals. However, improvement is required in service delivery and the efficacy of management. This could be achieved by a national database for PPFs, improved resource allocation, and prompt logistical support.

The Efficacy of Pre-Operative Self-Isolation Guidelines for Safe Elective Orthopaedic Surgeries: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Objectives This study aimed to determine the efficacy of the self-isolation guidance for elective orthopaedic surgery. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between patient compliance with the self-isolation guidance and the resulting COVID-19 status. This would give planning strategies for managing elective orthopaedic lists. Method For the study, 110 patients who underwent elective orthopaedic surgical procedures during a one-month period were identified. Patients scheduled for surgery were asked to take a SARS-CoV-2 PCR test three days prior to surgery and they were asked to follow the self-isolation guidance. On the day of admission, patients declared compliance with self-isolation regulations. Admission was refused in cases of non-compliance. After discharge, telephone calls were made to patients to determine the degree of compliance with the self-isolation guidance. Results Overall, 106 out of 107 patients that were compliant with the self-isolation guidance tested negative for COVID-19; 15 patients had their operation cancelled over the one-month period; of which one-third were cancelled by the patients themselves. Three patients were found to be non-compliant with the self-isolation guidance. Of these three non-compliant patients, one tested positive for COVID-19. Adherence to the self-isolation guidelines helped to prevent last-minute cancellations and manage the list effectively. Conclusions Compliance with our self-isolation guidance accompanied by PCR screening minimises the risk of testing positive for COVID-19 and is thus an effective system to safely perform elective orthopaedic surgery. Intentionally overbooking theatre lists by 10 to 12.5% may account for cancellations and improve theatre efficiencies during post-pandemic recovery plans for elective orthopaedic surgeries.

Impact of Concomitant Spinal Canal Stenosis on Clinical Presentation of Adult Onset Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Study Combining Clinical and Imaging Spectrum.

Aim Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DSL) is one of the reasons behind adult-onset backache due to degenerative spinal pathology. Clinical manifestations of this can range from asymptomatic patients to widely variable clinical signs and symptoms. Spinal canal stenosis (SCS) is the most common associated degenerative condition in the MRI of DSL. Moreover, other associated degenerative conditions may contribute significantly towards the clinical presentation. We have tried to assess the impact of SCS on the clinical symptomatology and presentation of the DSL by correlating the clinical and imaging findings. Methods This single-center prospective observational study has analysed 48 patients who were symptomatic due to DSL. The data was collected over a period of 18 months from January 2015 to June 2016 by screening through the adult patients presenting at the orthopaedic or spinal clinics with features suggestive of degenerative lumbar spine disease. Particular inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed as a screening tool and selected patients underwent imaging investigations. Patients had lumbar spine radiographs, both standing and flexion-extension view, and MRI of the lumbar spine. The presenting clinical features were documented. Their clinical and neurological assessment was done thoroughly by two qualified clinicians independently. Results The study population included 29 female (60.5%) and 19 male (39.5%) patients. The mean age of the study population was 49.5 years (SD 9.2 years). As per the radiological diagnostic criteria, 28 patients (58.3%) had features of SCS together with DSL and the rest of the 20 patients (41.7%) had DSL without SCS. Axial back pain and claudication had a statistically significant association with imaging findings. Similarly, patients with associated canal stenosis had statistically significant sensory and motor deficits, altered deep tendon reflexes. Facet joint angle more than 45 degrees at the level of the slip had a higher incidence of indicative presenting symptoms. However, this was not statistically proven. Conclusion DSL is a heterogeneous condition with the simultaneous presence of different degenerative processes in the lumbar spine at various stages. Hence, clinical presentations are widely variable. The concomitant presence of SCS significantly influences the clinical symptomatology with correlation to the MRI findings. Therefore, a judicious weighing of the clinical and imaging findings is crucial for prudent management planning for cases of DSL.

Safe Elective Surgical Practice During COVID-19 Pandemic - A Prospective Observational Study of 303 Elective Surgeries in the UK.

Aim During the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been worldwide cancellation of elective surgeries to protect patients from nosocomial viral transmission and peri-operative complications. With the unfolding situation, there is a definite need for an exit strategy to reinstate elective services. Therefore, more literature evidence supporting exit plans for elective surgical services is imperative to adopt a safe working principle. This study aims to provide evidence for safe elective surgical practice during the pandemic. Methodology This single centre, prospective, observational study included adult patients who were admitted and underwent elective surgical procedures in the trust's COVID-free environment at the Birmingham Treatment Centre between May 19 and July 14, 2020. Data were collected on demographic parameters, peri-operative variables, surgical specialities, COVID-19 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing results, post-operative complications and mortality. The study also highlighted the protocols it followed for the elective services during the pandemic. Results A total of 303 patients were included with mean age of 49.9 years (SD 16.5) comprising of 59% (178) female and 41% (125) male. They were classified according to the American Society of Anaesthesiologist Grade, different surgical specialities and types of anaesthesia used. Ninety-six percent (96%) of patients were discharged on the same day. Hundred percent (100%) compliance with pre-operative COVID-19 RT-PCR testing was maintained. There was no 30-day mortality or major respiratory complications. Conclusion Careful patient selection, simultaneous involvement of the pre-assessment and anaesthetic team, strict adherence to peri-operative protocols and delivering vigilant post-operative care for COVID-19 infection can help provide safe elective surgical services if the community transmission is under reasonable control. However, it is particularly important to maintain COVID-free safe environment for such procedures.

Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure During Hip Fracture Fixation: A Study Combining Surgical Experience and Fracture Complexity.

Aim Hip fracture fixation surgeries are one of the most common surgeries that every trauma unit does regularly. Surgical training and expertise to fix these fractures properly are quite crucial for every orthopaedic surgeon. Therefore, orthopaedic training programmes all over the world consider significant focus on this and teach trainee surgeons expectantly to manage these fractures independently. Surgical fixation of hip fractures often requires fluoroscopy assistance in the operating theatre with associated hazards from ionising radiation. Moreover, hip fractures can be sometimes quite complex and may require relatively more fluoroscopy usage even with the higher grade of the operating surgeons. Therefore, training need for hip fracture fixation surgery is imperative and there is also a need for intraoperative radiation safety. This study has tried to find a balance between intraoperative fluoroscopic radiation exposure, surgical training requirement, and hip fracture complexity. Methodology This single centre study has collected retrospective peri-operative data over a period of two years including hip fractures that required fluoroscopy-guided surgical fixation. Femoral head fractures, subtrochanteric fractures, diaphyseal fractures, and trochanteric fractures with associated pelvic fractures were excluded from the study. We collected data on demographic parameters, fracture complexity and grading (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association [AO/OTA] Classification), intraoperative ionising radiation exposure (centi-Gray/cm2), and grade of the operating surgeon in order to find any relation between these factors. Results Total 268 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 81.8 years (SD 9.3) comprising of 83 (31%) male patients and 185 (69%) female patients. The study population was further stratified into three groups depending upon the operating grade of the surgeon: 'Junior Trainee' (five years of experience; 148 cases [55%]); and 'Consultant' (fully trained to practice independently; 43 cases [16%]). There was no statistically significant difference among these three sub-groups with regards to the age (p = 0.79), gender (p = 0.73), body mass index (p = 0.46), and fracture pattern (p = 0.96) of the patients. However, consultants tend to operate more on the higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade patients (p = 0.049) with more comorbidities. There was statistically significant higher fluoroscopic radiation exposure while junior trainee surgeons (p = 0.005) were operating and during the higher complex grade of hip fracture (p = <0.001) fixation. Conclusion In conclusion, the quantity of intra-operative radiation dose utilised in the surgical fixation of hip fractures is significantly associated with the grade and level of training of the operating surgeon and fracture complexity type. The results of this study emphasise and support the importance of comprehensive, supervised, and structured orthopaedic training for in-theatre radiation safety. It is recommended to have a safe balance between teaching, learning, and prevention of ionising radiation hazards in order to optimally achieve trainee's professional development with successful patient outcomes.

Review of orthopaedic trauma surgery during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic - An observational cohort study in the UK.

AIM: This study aims to estimate the risk of acquiring medical complication or death from COVID-19 infection in patients who were admitted for orthopaedic trauma surgery during the peak and plateau of pandemic. Unlike other recently published studies, where patient-cohort included a more morbid group and cancer surgeries, we report on a group of patients who had limb surgery and were more akin to elective orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: The study included 214 patients who underwent orthopaedic trauma surgeries in the hospital between 12th March and 12th May-2020 when the pandemic was on the rise in the United Kingdom. Data was collected on demographic profile including comorbidities, ASA grade, COVID-19 testing, type of procedures and any readmissions, complications or mortality due to COVID-19. RESULTS: There were 7.9% readmissions and 52.9% of it was for respiratory complications. Only one patient had positive COVID-19 test during readmission. 30-day mortality for trauma surgeries was 0% if hip fractures were excluded and 2.8% in all patients. All the mortalities were for proximal femur fracture surgeries and between ASA Grade 3 and 4 or in patients above the age of 70 years. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that presence of COVID-19 virus in the community and hospital did not adversely affect the outcome of orthopaedic trauma surgeries or lead to excess mortality or readmissions in patients undergoing limb trauma surgery. The findings also support resumption of elective orthopaedic surgeries with appropriate risk stratification, patient optimization and with adequate infrastructural support amidst the recovery phase of the pandemic.

The impact of COVID-19 on the management and outcomes of patients with proximal femoral fractures: a multi-centre study of 580 patients.

BACKGROUND: On the 11th March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic. Multiple new guidelines were proposed and existing models of social, domestic and hospital care altered. Most healthcare systems were largely unprepared for this, and the pandemic has tested their adaptability. This study aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the demographics, presentation, clinical management and outcomes of patients with proximal femoral (hip) fractures comparing them to a similar cohort of patients admitted a year earlier. METHODS: This retrospective multi-centre cohort study compared all patients admitted with hip fractures between 1st March and 30th May 2019 (group PC: pre-COVID-19) with hip fracture patients admitted over the same time period during the pandemic in 2020 (group C: COVID-19). The data was obtained from the hospitals' local and National Hip Fracture Databases. Mortality data was checked with the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Primary outcomes were time to theatre, in-patient length of stay and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 580 patients were included (304 group PC, 276 group C). Patient demographics including Charlson Comorbidity Index and Nottingham Hip Fracture Scores were broadly similar across the two cohorts. There was a significant reduction in the percentage of total hip replacements (11 to 5%, p = 0.006) in group C. There was an increase in conservative management (1 to 5%, p = 0.002) in group C. Time to theatre was significantly delayed in group C (43.7 h) vs group PC (34.6 h) (p ≤ 0.001). The overall length of hospital stay was significantly longer in group PC (16.6 days) vs group C (15 days) (p = 0.025). The 30-day mortality rate in group C was 9.8% compared to 8.2% in group PC (p = 0.746), but for COVID-19 (+) patients, it was significantly higher at 38.2% vs 5.8% in COVID-19 (-) patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This is one of the largest multi-centre comparative cohort study in the literature to date examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of hip fracture patients. Whilst mortality rates were similar in both groups, COVID-19-positive patients were almost seven times more likely to die, reflecting the seriousness of the COVID-19 infection and its sequelae in such elderly, vulnerable patients.

Peri-operative Outcomes and Predictors of Mortality in COVID-19 Positive Patients with Hip Fractures: A Multicentre Study in the UK.

Aim: This UK based multi-centre study reports clinical characteristics, early outcomes and predictors of mortality in 34 consecutive COVID-19-positive hip fractures so that the lessons learnt could be utilised in other parts of World who are at a different phase of the pandemic. Methods: This study analysed patient admitted with hip fractures with COVID positive swabs, between March and May'2020 in three large hospitals covering a population of nearly two million. Data was collected on demographic profile, peri-operative variables, post-operative complications and mortality. The specific aim was to identify any variables, which could predict high 30-day mortality. Results: Overall, 12% of hip fractures were COVID positive with the mortality rate of 41.2%. The higher age (p = 0.036) and male gender (p = 0.025) was significantly associated with mortality and most of the deaths were between American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade 3 and 4 patients. The patients having intramedullary (IM) nailing were more likely to die (p = 0.02). There was no difference in laboratory parameters but there was significant difference in findings on chest radiographs (p < 0.001), post-operative oxygen requirements (p = 0.006) and early respiratory complications (p = 0.006). Conclusion: This study suggests that the mortality following surgery for a hip fracture in COVID-positive patients is strikingly high and is associated with higher age and male gender. Higher mortality has been observed for extracapsular fracture operated with intramedullary nailing. In the immediate post-operative period, rapid deterioration of chest imaging, higher oxygen requirement and early pulmonary complications can serve as warning signs and predicting factors for higher mortality.